Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Altrad Services Ltd and another v HMRC

In Altrad Services Ltd and another v HMRC [2022] UKUT 185 (TCC) (12 July) the Upper Tribunal (UT) decided that the taxpayers were entitled to capital allowances even though these had been created by an artificial series of transactions with no business purpose reversing the First-tier Tribunal’s (FTT’s) decision that the arrangements were defeated by a Ramsay analysis. 

The taxpayers (known as Cape and Wiseman at the FTT stage) had entered into arrangements that were designed to ‘step up’ the capital allowances to which they were entitled on assets that they already owned. In simplified terms the taxpayers sold the assets to a bank the bank leased the assets back to the taxpayers for three or four weeks and then the bank sold the assets back to the taxpayers. Under an anomaly in the legislation (that was subsequently corrected by FA 2011) the taxpayers contended that...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top