Chris Reece summarises the VAT decisions of the new First-tier Tribunal. Please note that the decision numbers are no longer sequential. These are up to date to 30 June 2009
Chris Reece summarises the VAT decisions of the new First-tier Tribunal. Please note that the decision numbers are no longer sequential. These are up to date to 30 June 2009
Capital introduced
In order to make the accounts balance the appellants' book-keeper had to include a figure for 'capital introduced'. The Tribunal was not convinced that the appellants had actually introduced capital to the business and agreed with HMRC's allegation that the 'capital introduced' was in fact undeclared takings.
The hearing was adjourned to allow the...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Chris Reece summarises the VAT decisions of the new First-tier Tribunal. Please note that the decision numbers are no longer sequential. These are up to date to 30 June 2009
Chris Reece summarises the VAT decisions of the new First-tier Tribunal. Please note that the decision numbers are no longer sequential. These are up to date to 30 June 2009
Capital introduced
In order to make the accounts balance the appellants' book-keeper had to include a figure for 'capital introduced'. The Tribunal was not convinced that the appellants had actually introduced capital to the business and agreed with HMRC's allegation that the 'capital introduced' was in fact undeclared takings.
The hearing was adjourned to allow the...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
.jpg?sfvrsn=335a554c_0 "300 x 250 (MPU)")