Andrew Roycroft (Norton Rose Fulbright) reviews the decision in the case of Bupa Insurance, which serves as a reminder that a tax avoidance purpose is, of itself, not sufficient for HMRC to deny a taxpayer its intended tax outcome
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Andrew Roycroft (Norton Rose Fulbright) reviews the decision in the case of Bupa Insurance, which serves as a reminder that a tax avoidance purpose is, of itself, not sufficient for HMRC to deny a taxpayer its intended tax outcome
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
.tmb-editorspic.jpg?sfvrsn=c9a7a0cc_1)
