Michael Anderson and Kevin Elliott compare and contrast the rule 18 process for bringing lead cases to the FTT with the more sophisticated GLO process which exists in the High Court to demonstrate how the use of rule 18 might be made more efficient and effective.
Following growing parliamentary and public interest in the use of avoidance the National Audit Office (NAO) published a report Tax avoidance: tackling marketed avoidance schemes in November 2012. The NAO report considered avoidance schemes used by large numbers of individuals and smaller businesses with some of the key findings being:
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Michael Anderson and Kevin Elliott compare and contrast the rule 18 process for bringing lead cases to the FTT with the more sophisticated GLO process which exists in the High Court to demonstrate how the use of rule 18 might be made more efficient and effective.
Following growing parliamentary and public interest in the use of avoidance the National Audit Office (NAO) published a report Tax avoidance: tackling marketed avoidance schemes in November 2012. The NAO report considered avoidance schemes used by large numbers of individuals and smaller businesses with some of the key findings being:
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: