Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v HMRC

In DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v HMRC [2022] UKSC 26 (12 October 2022) the Supreme Court (SC) held that an assessment of output tax under-declared on mixed supplies made by the appellant was not time barred. It also upheld HMRC’s power to refuse a person’s claim for input tax credit whilst it is verified and to decide later to pay a lower amount than what had been claimed. 

DCM was a VAT-registered business which specialised in the sale of dispensed spectacles and laser eye surgery under the name Optical Express.  It was partly exempt for VAT purposes and made mixed supplies for which the income had to be apportioned between taxable and exempt. 

The taxpayer and HMRC had been in dispute for many years but the relevant disputes for the purposes of this appeal to the SC related to: 

  • an assessment for under-declared output tax made by HMRC in October 2005 and whether...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top