Hartley Foster and Louisa Warburton review the impact of the Court of Appeal decision in Hankinson.
Before the introduction of self-assessment the role of assessing was undertaken by the inspector rather than by the taxpayer. The taxpayer was required to complete a return disclosing his categories of income and chargeable gains but the return did not determine his legal liability to tax. If the inspector was satisfied by the return he would make an assessment in accordance with it (under TMA 1970 s 29(1)(a) as enacted); if not he was entitled to make an assessment to the ‘best of his judgement’ (under TMA 1970 s 29(1)(b)). An...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Hartley Foster and Louisa Warburton review the impact of the Court of Appeal decision in Hankinson.
Before the introduction of self-assessment the role of assessing was undertaken by the inspector rather than by the taxpayer. The taxpayer was required to complete a return disclosing his categories of income and chargeable gains but the return did not determine his legal liability to tax. If the inspector was satisfied by the return he would make an assessment in accordance with it (under TMA 1970 s 29(1)(a) as enacted); if not he was entitled to make an assessment to the ‘best of his judgement’ (under TMA 1970 s 29(1)(b)). An...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: