Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Dr S Easow v HMRC (and related appeals)

Doctor—whether guilty of fraudulent conduct

In Dr S Easow v HMRC (and related appeals) (TC02882 – 4 October) HMRC discovered that a doctor (E) had failed to declare income arising from offshore bank accounts. Following an enquiry they formed the opinion that E had significantly underdeclared his income for several years. They issued discovery assessments and imposed penalties at the rate of 50% of the potential lost revenue. The First-tier Tribunal reviewed the evidence in detail and found that E ‘was attempting to conceal information from HMRC: this was not merely negligent conduct but fraudulent conduct’. The Tribunal also found that ‘HMRC were justified in regarding the disclosed deposits of undeclared business income as merely examples of what was likely to be a more widespread practice’. The Tribunal upheld all the assessments and penalties. (The Tribunal also upheld assessments and penalties at the rate of 42.5%...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top