Flat with defective cladding was a dwelling.
In Fish Homes v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 180 (TC) (8 April 2020) the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that a flat with defective cladding was suitable for use as a dwelling for the purposes of the 15% rate of SDLT. Although the taxpayer carried out a property rental business and the flat was acquired for the purposes of that business a non-qualifying individual was permitted to occupy the flat within three years of the effective date of acquisition so relief from the 15% rate was clawed back.
The taxpayer company (F) acquired a vacant flat for the purposes of its property rental business. Following completion it discovered that it could not let the flat on a formal tenancy because the block was rendered with dangerous...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Flat with defective cladding was a dwelling.
In Fish Homes v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 180 (TC) (8 April 2020) the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held that a flat with defective cladding was suitable for use as a dwelling for the purposes of the 15% rate of SDLT. Although the taxpayer carried out a property rental business and the flat was acquired for the purposes of that business a non-qualifying individual was permitted to occupy the flat within three years of the effective date of acquisition so relief from the 15% rate was clawed back.
The taxpayer company (F) acquired a vacant flat for the purposes of its property rental business. Following completion it discovered that it could not let the flat on a formal tenancy because the block was rendered with dangerous...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: