Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Flix Innovations v HMRC

In Flix Innovations v HMRC [2016] UKUT 301 (5 July 2016) the UT found that ordinary shares with a preferential right on a winding up did not qualify for EIS (enterprise investment scheme) despite bearing ‘the risk and reward of the company’s business’.

Following a reorganisation of the company its issued share capital had comprised ordinary shares with a preferential right on a winding up and deferred shares. The issue was whether the ordinary shares carried a preferential right to the company’s assets on a winding up for the purposes of ITA 2007 s 173(2)(aa). If they did the amounts subscribed on the shares did not qualify for EIS relief.

Flix accepted that the ordinary shares carried a preferential right to the company’s assets on its winding up. However it submitted that the words ‘carry any present or future preferential rights’ in s 173(2)(aa) should...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top