In G Scatola and others v HMRC [2025] UKUT 156 (TCC) (27 May) the Upper Tribunal (UT) dismissed the taxpayers’ appeal against closure notices charging SDLT resulting from a failed avoidance scheme. It also allowed HMRC’s cross-appeal in respect of an alternative discovery assessment.
The taxpayers entered into a marketed scheme intended to avoid SDLT on the purchase of a residential property. The scheme involved a sub-sale to V Ltd a special purpose vehicle in Guernsey and the grant of a 999-year lease back to the taxpayers. Three SDLT returns were filed:
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In G Scatola and others v HMRC [2025] UKUT 156 (TCC) (27 May) the Upper Tribunal (UT) dismissed the taxpayers’ appeal against closure notices charging SDLT resulting from a failed avoidance scheme. It also allowed HMRC’s cross-appeal in respect of an alternative discovery assessment.
The taxpayers entered into a marketed scheme intended to avoid SDLT on the purchase of a residential property. The scheme involved a sub-sale to V Ltd a special purpose vehicle in Guernsey and the grant of a 999-year lease back to the taxpayers. Three SDLT returns were filed:
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: