Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Hicks: discover the limits

Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC) review a recent tribunal decision which considers disclosure and the practical effect of Sanderson.
 

In J Hicks v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 22 Mr Hicks entered into a tax avoidance scheme devised by Montpelier in 2009 which had been disclosed to HMRC under the disclosure of tax avoidance schemes (DOTAS) rules. The scheme generated a loss for Mr Hicks of some £1.2m. Mr Hicks submitted his tax return for 2008/09 on 27 January 2010 which showed the loss of £1.2m as available to be carried forward and the scheme reference number (SRN) which had been allocated to the scheme by HMRC. HMRC opened an enquiry into the return on 3 December 2010.

Mr Hicks submitted his return for 2009/10 on 28 January 2011 and his return for 2010/11 on 31 January 2012. Both of these returns showed a carried forward loss from...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top