Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

O Fanning v HMRC

In O Fanning v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 292 (TC) (9 July 2020) the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an SDLT scheme that relied on the interaction between the old (now repealed) sub-sale provisions (at the then FA 2003 s 45) and the option provisions (at FA 2003 s 46) failed because the grant of the option (the secondary contract) was not substantially performed at the same time as the original contract. Alternatively FA 2003 s 75A applied. The FTT held that the consideration paid by the taxpayer was fully chargeable to SDLT and dismissed the appeal.

The taxpayer acquired a residential property in 2011 from an unrelated vendor for £5m. At the same time as the contract for the acquisition of the property was completed the taxpayer granted a call option to San Leon Energy PLC (San Leon) for £100 under which San Leon could buy the property for a...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top