In IGE USA Investments Ltd (formerly IGE USA Investments) v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 534 (14 April 2021) the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the decision of Zarcoli J and refused HMRC permission to amend in respect of their claim for equitable rescission on the ground of fraudulent misrepresentation. The key question on appeal was whether the six-year limitation period for claims founded on the tort of deceit under s 2 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) at least arguably applies ‘by analogy’ pursuant to LA 1980 s 36(1) to a claim for equitable rescission of a contract for fraudulent misrepresentation. LA 1980 s 36 provides that if you are seeking a form of equitable relief the time limits under LA 1980 are not to be applied automatically when pursuing certain types of claim ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In IGE USA Investments Ltd (formerly IGE USA Investments) v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 534 (14 April 2021) the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the decision of Zarcoli J and refused HMRC permission to amend in respect of their claim for equitable rescission on the ground of fraudulent misrepresentation. The key question on appeal was whether the six-year limitation period for claims founded on the tort of deceit under s 2 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) at least arguably applies ‘by analogy’ pursuant to LA 1980 s 36(1) to a claim for equitable rescission of a contract for fraudulent misrepresentation. LA 1980 s 36 provides that if you are seeking a form of equitable relief the time limits under LA 1980 are not to be applied automatically when pursuing certain types of claim ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: