In S Munir v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 799 (26 May 2021) the Court of Appeal found that the FTT had erred in its decision not to strike out the appellant's case because it had failed to take into account all the relevant facts surrounding the conviction which should have been resolved against the appellant who had no reasonable prospect of showing he was not the holder of the goods. Read the decision.
In the joined cases of Finanzamt N (Communication de l’affectation) (Case C-45/20) and Finanzamt G (Communication de l’affectation) (Case C-46/20) (20 May 2021) the advocate general opined that a VAT system which refused an input tax deduction on the basis that the decision to allocate the input VAT on mixed used assets was not communicated to the tax authority...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In S Munir v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 799 (26 May 2021) the Court of Appeal found that the FTT had erred in its decision not to strike out the appellant's case because it had failed to take into account all the relevant facts surrounding the conviction which should have been resolved against the appellant who had no reasonable prospect of showing he was not the holder of the goods. Read the decision.
In the joined cases of Finanzamt N (Communication de l’affectation) (Case C-45/20) and Finanzamt G (Communication de l’affectation) (Case C-46/20) (20 May 2021) the advocate general opined that a VAT system which refused an input tax deduction on the basis that the decision to allocate the input VAT on mixed used assets was not communicated to the tax authority...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: