Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Philips Electronics UK Ltd v HMRC

In Philips Electronics UK Ltd v HMRC (CJEU Case C-18/11) a UK company (P) claimed consortium relief in respect of losses incurred by a UK branch of an associated Netherlands company. HMRC rejected the claim on the basis that the effect of ICTA 1988 ss 403D and 406(2) was that P was not entitled to relief for these losses. P appealed contending that the relevant provisions of ss 403D and 406(2) contravened EC law. The Upper Tribunal directed that the case should be referred to the CJEU for a ruling on the interpretation of Article 49 of the TFEU. Advocate-General Kokott expressed the Opinion that it was a restriction on the freedom of establishment ‘for a Member State to prevent the surrender of the losses incurred in that Member State by a resident permanent establishment of a non-resident company to a resident company by way of group...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top