The ‘revenue rule’ is a longstanding legal principle that the courts of one country will not enforce the tax laws of another country. It was recently tested in the High Court, as David Corker and Claire Cross (Corker Binning) report.
The juggernaut case of Skattenforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners & others [2021] EWHC 974 (Comm) (‘the proceedings’) came to an abrupt halt in April of this year courtesy of Dicey’s ‘rule 3’.
Dicey’s rule 3 also known as the revenue rule in respect of tax matters prevents a sovereign state from suing in a foreign court for taxes owed to it.
Cum ex
The background to the Danish tax...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The ‘revenue rule’ is a longstanding legal principle that the courts of one country will not enforce the tax laws of another country. It was recently tested in the High Court, as David Corker and Claire Cross (Corker Binning) report.
The juggernaut case of Skattenforvaltningen (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners & others [2021] EWHC 974 (Comm) (‘the proceedings’) came to an abrupt halt in April of this year courtesy of Dicey’s ‘rule 3’.
Dicey’s rule 3 also known as the revenue rule in respect of tax matters prevents a sovereign state from suing in a foreign court for taxes owed to it.
Cum ex
The background to the Danish tax...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
