Hui Ling McCarthy (Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers) writes that abandoning a statutory appeal when HMRC considers the proper route to be a claim for judicial review is not a decision to be taken lightly, and may lead to unexpected and unwelcome consequences.
Following HMRC’s recent success in restricting the scope of the First-tier Tribunal’s jurisdiction on a statutory appeal in the light of Oxfam v HMRC [2010] STC 686 (e.g. HMRC v Abdul Noor [2013] UKUT 71 (TCC) HMRC v Bosher [2013] UKUT 579 (TCC) and HMRC v Dhanak [2014] UKUT 68 (TCC)) advisers may think there is little point appealing to the FTT if HMRC has indicated that it considers the proper route to be a claim for judicial review. Why not avoid the ‘procedural thicket’ of running an FTT appeal concurrently with a...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Hui Ling McCarthy (Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers) writes that abandoning a statutory appeal when HMRC considers the proper route to be a claim for judicial review is not a decision to be taken lightly, and may lead to unexpected and unwelcome consequences.
Following HMRC’s recent success in restricting the scope of the First-tier Tribunal’s jurisdiction on a statutory appeal in the light of Oxfam v HMRC [2010] STC 686 (e.g. HMRC v Abdul Noor [2013] UKUT 71 (TCC) HMRC v Bosher [2013] UKUT 579 (TCC) and HMRC v Dhanak [2014] UKUT 68 (TCC)) advisers may think there is little point appealing to the FTT if HMRC has indicated that it considers the proper route to be a claim for judicial review. Why not avoid the ‘procedural thicket’ of running an FTT appeal concurrently with a...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: