Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Stoke and the sporting services VAT exemption

Speed read

On 17 October 2018, the Upper Tribunal released its decision in HMRC v Stoke by Nayland Golf and Leisure and dismissed HMRC’s appeal. This decision is the first time that HMRC has lost a case involving the sporting services VAT exemption and whether a supplier of sporting services is subject to commercial influence. The decision covers a number of distinct issues that have significant ramifications both for taxpayers who are seeking to pursue an Edwards v Bairstow challenge to a decision of the fact finding tribunal and for those seeking to apply the sporting exemption.

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top