Tax relief for negative earnings

Philip Fisher

Philip Fisher considers the impact of the FTT decision in Martin concerning tax relief for negative earnings.

In making his decision in the case of Martin v HMRC judge Howard Nowlan may offer hope to many taxpayers who are taxed on salary or bonuses from which they never ultimately benefit.

In the case of Martin v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 040 (TC) Mr Martin an employee was offered a refundable signing bonus of £250 000 on entering into a new contract with his employers. It was repayable on a sliding scale if employment ended within five years. Subsequently he left the company and repaid £162 500.

PAYE and NIC were accounted for on receipt of the bonus as one would expect. The problem came when HMRC denied Mr Martin tax...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Subscribe Now...

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.

Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

Philip Fisher considers the impact of the FTT decision in Martin concerning tax relief for negative earnings.

In making his decision in the case of Martin v HMRC judge Howard Nowlan may offer hope to many taxpayers who are taxed on salary or bonuses from which they never ultimately benefit.

PAYE and NIC were accounted for on receipt of the bonus as one would expect. The problem came when HMRC denied Mr Martin tax...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: