Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

The Union Castle Mail Steamship Company v HMRC

No loss arising from a derivative contract

In The Union Castle Mail Steamship Company v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 526 (27 July 2006) the FTT found that a scheme implemented to transfer derivative contracts between group companies without crystallising a tax charge had failed.

Union Castle was a wholly owned subsidiary of Caledonia. The board of Caledonia had believed there was a significant risk of a fall in the UK equity markets; and had decided to protect the value of Caledonia’s investment portfolio by purchasing a series of FTSE 250 put options. In order not to imperil Caledonia’s investment trust status the purchase had been made by Union Castle. It was subsequently decided that Caledonia itself could purchase FTSE options as a legitimate part of its investment activity.

Consideration was given to novating the derivatives contracts from Union Castle to Caledonia but a tax charge would be crystallised...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top