Lee Squires and Fiona Bantock review the VAT developments that matter.
In GMAC v HMRC [2012] UKUT 279 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) considered the compatibility with EU law of the UK’s historic regime for VAT relief on bad debts in the context of hire-purchase (HP) agreements for cars.
Article 11C(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive (now Article 90 of the Principal VAT Directive) provided that in the case of total or partial non-payment of the consideration for a supply the taxable amount was reduced under conditions determined by States although States could derogate from this rule. The UK implemented this in VATA 1983 s 22 which entitled a taxpayer to claim a refund of VAT accounted for on a supply to the extent the consideration was not paid (bad debt relief or BDR). However BDR was not available in...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Lee Squires and Fiona Bantock review the VAT developments that matter.
In GMAC v HMRC [2012] UKUT 279 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) considered the compatibility with EU law of the UK’s historic regime for VAT relief on bad debts in the context of hire-purchase (HP) agreements for cars.
Article 11C(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive (now Article 90 of the Principal VAT Directive) provided that in the case of total or partial non-payment of the consideration for a supply the taxable amount was reduced under conditions determined by States although States could derogate from this rule. The UK implemented this in VATA 1983 s 22 which entitled a taxpayer to claim a refund of VAT accounted for on a supply to the extent the consideration was not paid (bad debt relief or BDR). However BDR was not available in...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: