The decision of the CJEU in the Deutsche Bank case (C-44/11) has confirmed that discretionary portfolio management should be treated as one composite taxable supply. This calls into question HMRC’s current policy in this area and raises concerns about its recently issued guidance in respect of the retail distribution review.
The fact that in the Deutsche Bank case the CJEU has followed the reasoning of the Advocate General in seeing discretionary portfolio management as one composite supply rather than two supplies of advice and execution was expected by most commentators. As was the conclusion that the advisory element defined the nature of the overall service with the result that the service should be treated as taxable and not exempt as the funds under management did not fall within the exemption for...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The decision of the CJEU in the Deutsche Bank case (C-44/11) has confirmed that discretionary portfolio management should be treated as one composite taxable supply. This calls into question HMRC’s current policy in this area and raises concerns about its recently issued guidance in respect of the retail distribution review.
The fact that in the Deutsche Bank case the CJEU has followed the reasoning of the Advocate General in seeing discretionary portfolio management as one composite supply rather than two supplies of advice and execution was expected by most commentators. As was the conclusion that the advisory element defined the nature of the overall service with the result that the service should be treated as taxable and not exempt as the funds under management did not fall within the exemption for...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: