Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

DISCOVERY-ASSESSMENTS


The judgment in Tooth increases the weight of authority behind the issue of 'staleness', but that concept is not yet settled.
Although the Court of Appeal decided that HMRC had not made a discovery, the judgment contains unhelpful comments for taxpayers, as Clara Boyd and Ian Robotham (Pinsent Masons) explain.
The 2019 loan charge teaches us that there is more to statutory time limits than the technical analysis, write Richard Jeens and Rose Swaffield (Slaughter and May). 
 
Helen Adams (BDO) considers the extent of HMRC's powers on discovery in the light of recent case law.
Josie Hills and Steven Porter (Pinsent Masons) explore when a discovery by HMRC is considered stale following recent case law.
 

Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC) examine the First-tier Tribunal decision.

A number of recent tribunal decisions have added to our understanding of how this important part of the tax system works, writes Andrew Hubbard (LexisNexis).
 
Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC) review a recent tribunal decision which considers disclosure and the practical effect of Sanderson.
 
Andrew Goldstone and Katie Doyle (Mishcon de Reya) review recent developments in the private client world.
 
EDITOR'S PICKstar
300 x 250 (MPU)
Top