Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Litigation
Home
Litigation
LITIGATION
Boulting: jurisdiction and the rule of law
Constantine Christofi
Robert Waterson
Adam Craggs
Adam Craggs, Robert Waterson and Constantine Christofi (RPC) examine the High Court decision that refused permission to bring a judicial review claim against HMRC.
AXA v Genworth: gross misunderstandings?
Helen Coward
Helen Coward (Charles Russell Speechlys) reviews a recent High Court case
on the meaning of a gross-up clause in a share purchase agreement.
Charman: old ERS law, new insights
Nigel Doran
Philip Swinburn
Nigel Doran and Philip Swinburn (Macfarlanes) examine the Upper Tribunal decision on the employment-related securities provisions of ITEPA 2003 Part 7.
Parry: pension transfers and omissions
Matthew Harrison
Matthew Harrison (Withers) examines the impact of a recent Supreme Court decision.
Contentious tax: quarterly review
Constantine Christofi
Adam Craggs
Recent trends in the contentious tax world, by Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC).
Do HMRC’s allegations of fraud against GE signal a new era in tax investigations?
Helen Buchanan
John Tolman
Helen Buchanan and John Tolman (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer) examine
what is effectively the pilot episode for an upcoming courtroom drama.
Company residence
Jackie Wheaton
Jackie Wheaton (BDO) examines the case law in determining when a company is resident in the UK for tax purposes.
Tyrwhitt: when employees become partners
Dominic Stuttaford
Sofia Casselbrant
Dominic Stuttaford and Sofia Casselbrant-Multala (Norton Rose Fulbright)
review the NICs treatment of bonus payments by LLP to former employees
who subsequently become members.
Apple: the Commission fails to overcome its evidential burden
Tarlochan Lall
George Peretz KC
The General Court’s decision shows the difficulties the European Commission
faces in proving selective tax advantages that may constitute unlawful state
aid, write George Peretz QC and Tarlochan Lall (Monckton Chambers).
Negative earnings: how wide is their scope?
Nigel Doran
The scope of negative earnings is almost certainly wider than has generally
been appreciated, writes Nigel Doran (Macfarlanes).
Go to page
of
51
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
UK posts record January budget surplus following increased tax receipts
HMRC guidance on R&D relief in the creative sector
Deferred remuneration for globally mobile employees
New guidance on registering for VAT IOSS scheme
Devolved Scottish Aggregates Tax to take effect from 1 April 2026
CASES
Read all
Lycamobile UK Ltd v HMRC
A Ferguson and another v HMRC
Genuine Care Homecare Services Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 27 February 2026
MWL International Ltd
IN BRIEF
Read all
Crypto things
Tax efficient trust planning with surplus income
Suspended penalties
The Supreme Court hearing in Orsted Sands
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
MOST READ
Read all
Exchequer Secretary defends tax adviser registration regime as Law Society warns of market impact
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Deductions after AD Bly: a shortcut for remuneration or pension provision?
Alimahomed: the Upper Tribunal gives ‘remittance’ a real world interpretation
Consultation tracker