Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Corporate taxes
Home
Corporate taxes
CORPORATE TAXES
The impact of Pillar Two on tax risk apportionment for a corporate sale
Anne Powell
Anne Powell (Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner) considers how our historic experience of tax covenants steer us to resolve new Pillar Two risks.
Writing off a loan: the unallowable purpose trap
Mark Whitehouse
Mairead Cummins
Tax Journal
’s recent coverage of the
Keighley
case has largely focused on connected companies issues. Here, Mark Whitehouse and Mairead Cummins (PwC) focus on the other key issue in that case: the ‘gateway test’ for the deductibility of loan relationship debits.
Difficult choices: disguised remuneration in the context of corporate insolvency
Jon Preshaw
Ben Proctor
Significant employment tax charges can arise in certain insolvency situations
where there was never an intention for rewards to be provided in connection
with employment, write Jon Preshaw and Ben Proctor (Jon Preshaw Tax).
Tax and the City review for February 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
The Court of Appeal’s decision in
Dolphin Drilling
and consultation responses on the modernisation of transfer pricing, DPT and PEs are among the recent developments in this month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Tax clouds on the Horizon for the Post Office?
Heather Self
Heather Self (Blick Rothenberg) considers the tax issues surrounding compensation payments made by the Post Office to subpostmasters.
On purpose: developments in the main purpose test
Oliver Walker
Akash Mehta
Oliver Walker and Akash Mehta (Weil, Gotshal & Manges) consider the
current status of the TCGA 1992 s 137 main purpose test.
The move to permanent full expensing
Jasmine Kaur
The move to permanent full expensing marks a change in UK corporate tax strategy, writes Jasmine Kaur, Head of Capital Allowances at HM Treasury.
2023: a parting glance in the rear view mirror for corporate tax practitioners
Gerald Montagu
It is in the tribunals and courts that many of the more interesting developments have taken place during 2023, writes Gerald Montagu (Gide).
New R&D scheme misses the point
Justine Dignam
The latest R&D reforms were said to simplify the tax regime and encourage
business investment. The reality though is more complexity, writes
Justine Dignam (Markel Tax).
The resurgence of crown preference: the dog in the manger
Eloise Walker
Are we seeing a slow return to Crown preference (including for corporation tax) by the back door, asks Eloise Walker (Pinsent Masons).
Go to page
of
300
EDITOR'S PICK
Cards face up? HMRC’s approach to the duty of candour
Robert Waterson
,
Rebekka Sandwell
1 /7
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Heather Self
2 /7
The new Overseas Workday Relief regime: worse than before?
Steve Wade
3 /7
A new chapter in the unallowable purpose tale: the FTT’s decision in Syngenta
Tanja Velling
4 /7
Non-doms post-Budget: where are we now?
Helen McGhee
,
Lynnette Bober
5 /7
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
6 /7
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
7 /7
Cards face up? HMRC’s approach to the duty of candour
Robert Waterson
,
Rebekka Sandwell
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Heather Self
The new Overseas Workday Relief regime: worse than before?
Steve Wade
A new chapter in the unallowable purpose tale: the FTT’s decision in Syngenta
Tanja Velling
Non-doms post-Budget: where are we now?
Helen McGhee
,
Lynnette Bober
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
NEWS
Read all
Tax Journal authors for November 2024
HMRC manual changes: 6 December 2024
Exchequer Secretary committed to MTD timetable following ‘robust’ conversations with HMRC
MTD: catching up with digital records
No new side hustle tax, HMRC confirm
CASES
Read all
Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC
R Grint v HMRC
L v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 6 December 2024
R (oao Cobalt Data Centre 2 LLP and another) v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
A tale of two businesses
Pension ‘megafund’ reforms: how does tax fit in?
VAT on livestream events
Time for a replacement wealth tax?
Refinitiv: not so clear cut
MOST READ
Read all
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Cobalt Data Centre: golden opportunity lost
R (oao Cobalt Data Centre 2 LLP and another) v HMRC
Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC
The Tower One St George Wharf Ltd v HMRC
HMRC v The Taxpayer and others