Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Corporate taxes
Home
Corporate taxes
CORPORATE TAXES
No joy for JTIAC: an extension of the unallowable purpose principle
Constantine Christofi
The last in a trilogy of recent Court of Appeal cases on ‘unallowable purpose’ has seemingly extended its ambit yet further, writes Constantine Christofi (EY).
The CIR and related party guarantees: a case study for a privately owned UK group
Robert Langston
Robert Langston (Saffery) provides a practical case study on the operation
of the corporate interest restriction where related party guarantees and
withholding tax issues are involved.
A cautionary tale: how to fail to show accounts are GAAP-compliant
Gerald Montagu
Gerald Montagu (Gide Loyrette Nouel) examines the recent decision in
Barclays Bank Plc v HMRC
.
The impact of Pillar Two on tax risk apportionment for a corporate sale
Anne Powell
Anne Powell (Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner) considers how our historic experience of tax covenants steer us to resolve new Pillar Two risks.
Writing off a loan: the unallowable purpose trap
Mark Whitehouse
Mairead Cummins
Tax Journal
’s recent coverage of the
Keighley
case has largely focused on connected companies issues. Here, Mark Whitehouse and Mairead Cummins (PwC) focus on the other key issue in that case: the ‘gateway test’ for the deductibility of loan relationship debits.
Difficult choices: disguised remuneration in the context of corporate insolvency
Jon Preshaw
Ben Proctor
Significant employment tax charges can arise in certain insolvency situations
where there was never an intention for rewards to be provided in connection
with employment, write Jon Preshaw and Ben Proctor (Jon Preshaw Tax).
Tax and the City review for February 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
The Court of Appeal’s decision in
Dolphin Drilling
and consultation responses on the modernisation of transfer pricing, DPT and PEs are among the recent developments in this month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
Tax clouds on the Horizon for the Post Office?
Heather Self
Heather Self (Blick Rothenberg) considers the tax issues surrounding compensation payments made by the Post Office to subpostmasters.
On purpose: developments in the main purpose test
Oliver Walker
Akash Mehta
Oliver Walker and Akash Mehta (Weil, Gotshal & Manges) consider the
current status of the TCGA 1992 s 137 main purpose test.
The move to permanent full expensing
Jasmine Kaur
The move to permanent full expensing marks a change in UK corporate tax strategy, writes Jasmine Kaur, Head of Capital Allowances at HM Treasury.
Go to page
of
301
EDITOR'S PICK
Sample India’s 2025 GST Amendments
Test Samarth
1 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
2 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
3 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
4 /7
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
5 /7
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
6 /7
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
7 /7
Sample India’s 2025 GST Amendments
Test Samarth
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
Enhancing UK tax policy: a blueprint for supporting technological innovation
Dominic Mathon
,
Kate Murphy
Carried interest tax reform: next steps
Damien Crossley
,
Bezhan Salehy
The new UK PE, TP and UTPP rules: key questions
Mark Bevington
Tax odyssey: the journey to a single securities tax
Naomi Lawton
NEWS
Read all
Sample India’s 2025 GST Amendments
Test-Chancellor outlines financial services strategy
Test16/09/2025-Chancellor outlines financial services strategy
Test16/09/2025-Chancellor outlines financial services strategyAA
HMRC manual changes: 18 July 2025
CASES
Read all
Sample India’s 2025 GST Amendments
Abbotsford Property Group Ltd and another v Revenue Scotland
R (oao Thomas Holdings Ltd and others) v HMRC
G Stenhouse and another v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 18 July 2025
IN BRIEF
Read all
HMRC’s approach to wealthy individuals
There’s only one POEM
Discovery assessments: agents
Standish v Standish
Section 899 compromise shifts international tax landscape
MOST READ
Read all
‘Legislation Day’ date announced
G Haworth and others v HMRC
One Big Beautiful Bill Act enacted
Abbotsford Property Group Ltd and another v Revenue Scotland
One minute with... Charlie Friend