Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Anti avoidance
Home
Anti avoidance
ANTI AVOIDANCE
The BEPS multilateral convention: who loves SLOBs?
Dan Neidle
Jemma Dick
The BEPS limitation on benefits article would hinder cross-border investment. Dan Neidle and Jemma Dick (Clifford Chance) consider why it’s likely to be of limited application.
Berlioz: challenges to information orders – fair or fantastic?
Timothy Lyons QC
Timothy Lyons QC (39 Essex Chambers) examines a case on exchange of information which deals with issues fundamental to administration of justice.
Ingenious Film Partners 2: whether deductions are capital or revenue in nature?
Lee Ellis
Lee Ellis (Stewarts Law) analyses the tribunal’s supplemental decision that ‘the rights’ to income from the investments made by the Ingenious LLPs were capital in nature and its likely contentious future.
Why I’m challenging Uber
Jolyon Maugham
Jolyon Maugham QC (The Good Law Project) explains why he has issued proceedings in the High Court against Uber to ensure that it pays VAT on supplying transportation services.
New corporate criminal offence: what will an investigation look like?
Jason Collins
Large companies should refresh their raids and critical incident procedures in the event that HMRC decides to investigate, writes Jason Collins (Pinsent Masons).
Unexplained wealth orders
Jonathan Blunden
Jonathan Grimes
The Criminal Finances Act 2017 makes provision for unexplained wealth orders. Jonathan Grimes and Jonathan Blunden (Kingsley Napley) explain what the orders will mean.
What’s proposed on tackling fraud in the construction industry?
Rowena Clifton
Rowena Clifton (RSM) explains the proposed new measures to tackle VAT and income tax fraud in the construction industry.
HMRC’s information powers
Annis Lampard
Jenny Tevlin
Nigel Barker
Nigel Barker, Annis Lampard and Jenny Tevlin (Deloitte) examine what Schedule 36 powers mean in practice, and unwrap the latest trends in HMRC analytics.
How to handle the apprenticeship levy
An expert guide by Tolley Guidance.
Tax and corporate responsibility: will 2017 be the year that they come together?
Maya Forstater
Maya Forstater (Centre for Global Development) asks whether 2017 will be
the year that they come together.
Go to page
of
225
EDITOR'S PICK
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
1 /7
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
2 /7
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
3 /7
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
4 /7
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
5 /7
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
,
Elvira Colomer Fatjo
6 /7
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
7 /7
Tax Journal's 2025 Budget coverage
Management expenses: HMRC’s new nudge campaign
Anna Lucey
,
Constantine Christofi
Medpro: better late than never
Stacey Cranmore
No escape: the new IHT tax rules for pensions
Harriet Betteridge
What time is it? A review of the Supreme Court’s decision in Prudential
David Jamieson
The trials and tribulations of interest withholding tax
Bezhan Salehy
,
Rebecca Rose
Understanding the FIG regime
Jo Bateson
NEWS
Read all
UK posts record January budget surplus following increased tax receipts
HMRC guidance on R&D relief in the creative sector
Deferred remuneration for globally mobile employees
New guidance on registering for VAT IOSS scheme
Devolved Scottish Aggregates Tax to take effect from 1 April 2026
CASES
Read all
Lycamobile UK Ltd v HMRC
A Ferguson and another v HMRC
Genuine Care Homecare Services Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 27 February 2026
MWL International Ltd
IN BRIEF
Read all
Crypto things
Tax efficient trust planning with surplus income
Suspended penalties
The Supreme Court hearing in Orsted Sands
Concerns over the scope of new conduct rules for advisers
MOST READ
Read all
Exchequer Secretary defends tax adviser registration regime as Law Society warns of market impact
Mandatory agent registration: what we know so far
Deductions after AD Bly: a shortcut for remuneration or pension provision?
Alimahomed: the Upper Tribunal gives ‘remittance’ a real world interpretation
Consultation tracker